Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x Review 2026: Is It Worth $749.99?
BENCH TESTED
For this Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x review, BeautyBench used the Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x several times on curly, past-shoulder-length hair. We evaluated drying performance, styling results, volume retention and the overall multi-styler experience. We have also used the Shark FlexStyle, giving us firsthand context for the competing platform.
The Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x carries a serious price tag, but after using it several times, we came away impressed. Its standout strength was drying speed, particularly on longer curly hair, while still preserving the volume that can disappear during heat styling. And having used the Shark FlexStyle as well, our preference is clear: the Dyson is the better overall multi-styler. The question is whether those advantages justify the premium.
BeautyBench Quick Verdict
Check current price on Amazon →
Yes, we think the Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x is worth its premium price for frequent stylers who will actually use its versatility. It combines exceptional drying speed with strong styling performance and impressive volume retention. The Shark FlexStyle remains a compelling lower-cost alternative, but based on our experience with both, the Co-anda2x delivers the more refined overall multi-styler experience.
Best for: Frequent stylers, curly or longer hair, and buyers who prioritize performance over price.
Think twice if: You style infrequently, primarily need a basic dryer, or value savings more than the Dyson’s performance advantages.
BeautyBench Score: 9.4/10
| Category | Score |
|---|---|
| Drying Performance | 9.7/10 |
| Styling Performance | 9.4/10 |
| Volume Retention | 9.5/10 |
| Versatility | 9.5/10 |
| Value | 9.0/10 |
| Overall Bench Score | 9.4/10 |
How we score: The Bench Score combines our firsthand experience with verified product capabilities and value considerations. We do not represent these scores as laboratory measurements.
What We Loved, and What to Know
PROS
- Exceptional drying speed
- Preserved volume on curly, past-shoulder-length hair
- Excellent overall styling versatility
- Refined user experience
- Stronger overall multi-styler in our experience than the Shark FlexStyle
- Premium performance helps justify the premium price
CONS
- Very expensive
- Existing Airwrap owners cannot reuse all previous-generation attachments
- More capability than occasional stylers may need
- Shark FlexStyle offers a substantially less expensive route into multi-styling
What Makes the Co-anda2x Different?
The Co-anda2x isn’t simply another attachment bundle. Dyson redesigned the Airwrap platform around its Hyperdymium 2 motor, and says the new system produces twice the air pressure and 30% more power than the Airwrap i.d. The goal is straightforward: faster drying, stronger hair wrapping and more capable styling without turning the Airwrap into a conventional high-heat styling tool.
The platform also introduces intelligent attachment recognition. Compatible attachments can trigger recommended settings and remember previously used airflow and temperature preferences. The automated curling sequence remains, while the curling barrels can detect when hair has wrapped around the barrel and advance the styling sequence.
One of the most significant additions is AirSmooth2x, which uses airflow and tension between two plates to smooth and straighten hair. That broadens the Airwrap from a curl-and-blowout specialist into a more complete multi-styling platform. (For the manufacturer’s full specifications and attachment details, see Dyson’s official Co-anda2x page.)
BeautyBench take: The increased airflow isn’t just a specification-sheet improvement. Faster drying was the most obvious advantage during our own use of the Co-anda2x.
Drying Performance: The Standout Feature
Drying speed was the biggest surprise in our testing. On curly hair extending past the shoulders, the Co-anda2x moved through the drying portion of the routine remarkably quickly. More importantly, that speed didn’t come at the expense of the volume we wanted from the finished style.
That experience is consistent with independent hands-on testing. Allure’s testers reported notably fast drying across different hair types. One tester dried thick, wavy hair with the round brush in under 10 minutes, while another described the dryer attachment as powerful enough to remove excess water from fine, long hair in less than two minutes.
That doesn’t mean everyone will reproduce those times. Hair density, length, starting moisture and attachment choice matter. But both our experience and independent testing point in the same direction: speed is one of the Co-anda2x’s strongest reasons for upgrading.
Styling Results: Fast Without Falling Flat
Speed matters only if the finished result is good. On the curly, past-shoulder-length hair we styled, the Co-anda2x maintained impressive volume. That’s significant because faster drying can sometimes leave a style technically dry but lacking shape and movement.
The combination of airflow and multiple styling attachments is where the Airwrap concept continues to make sense. Instead of treating drying and styling as completely separate steps, the Co-anda2x is designed to shape the hair while moisture is being removed.
Independent testing provides useful context here too. Allure reported bouncy, shiny results from the round volumizing brush, including one tester whose waves remained noticeably intact over several days.
Our experience: exceptional speed + retained volume is the combination that sold us on the Co-anda2x.
Attachments: More Than a Curling Tool
The attachment ecosystem is central to the Co-anda2x’s value proposition. Depending on the hair-specific configuration, Dyson offers tools for curling, smoothing, volumizing, diffusing and other styling tasks. Dyson’s current documentation includes multiple Co-anda2x curling-barrel sizes, with increased Coanda airflow intended to wrap hair faster.
The AirSmooth2x attachment is particularly important because it expands what the system can do beyond curls and blowouts. It uses airflow rather than traditional heated straightening plates to create a smoother, straighter finish.
There is an upgrade caveat, however: don’t assume an existing collection of older Airwrap attachments will carry over to the new platform. The Co-anda2x redesign changes the attachment ecosystem, which reduces the value proposition for someone who has already invested heavily in a previous Airwrap generation.
How Did It Perform on Curly Hair?
Our hands-on experience was with curly hair extending past the shoulders, and this is where the Co-anda2x made a particularly strong impression. After several uses, two qualities consistently stood out: speed and volume.
The device handled the drying workload faster than we expected while still allowing the finished style to retain body. For someone with longer curly hair, where drying and styling can become a substantial time commitment, that efficiency changes the value equation.
We wouldn’t claim that our results represent every curl pattern or routine. Products, technique, density and desired finish all matter. But for the hair we actually styled, the Co-anda2x performed exceptionally well.
Dyson Co-anda2x vs. Shark FlexStyle: We’ve Used Both
We’ve also used the Shark FlexStyle, which gives us firsthand context that specification comparisons alone can’t provide.
The FlexStyle’s strongest argument is value. It offers genuine multi-styling versatility at a substantially lower entry price, and that makes it an important alternative for shoppers who simply cannot justify Dyson-level spending.
But when price isn’t the deciding factor, our preference is the Dyson Co-anda2x. In our experience, the Dyson feels like the stronger overall multi-styling system, particularly when drying performance and the complete styling experience are considered together.
That doesn’t make the Shark a bad purchase. It means these products serve somewhat different buyers:
| Dyson Co-anda2x | Shark FlexStyle | |
|---|---|---|
| Best argument | Performance and refinement | Value |
| Our hands-on preference | Dyson | Strong alternative |
| Better for | Frequent stylers prioritizing performance | Buyers prioritizing savings |
| Price position | Ultra-premium | More accessible |
Check current price on Amazon →
Is the Dyson Co-anda2x Worth $750?
For us, yes, with an important qualification.
A roughly $750 hair tool is not inexpensive simply because it performs well. The better question is whether its capabilities will replace enough separate tools and save enough styling time to justify the investment for a particular buyer.
After several uses, we think the premium is justified for someone who styles frequently and will take advantage of the system’s versatility. The drying speed alone was impressive, and retaining volume while working quickly made the experience feel meaningfully different rather than merely luxurious.
Someone who styles once every few weeks has a much harder value equation. For that buyer, the FlexStyle or an older Airwrap generation may make considerably more financial sense.
The Co-anda2x launched in 2025, and current U.S. list pricing for the latest configurations reaches $749.99.
Who Should Buy the Co-anda2x?
- People who style their hair frequently
- Buyers with longer hair who value faster drying
- Curly-haired users looking for drying and styling versatility
- People who want volume rather than simply getting hair dry
- Buyers who want one premium platform for several styling jobs
- People willing to pay more for the stronger overall experience
Who Should Skip It?
- Occasional stylers Buyers primarily looking for a basic hair dryer
- Anyone whose overriding priority is price
- Existing Airwrap owners who are satisfied with their current performance
- Buyers expecting all older Airwrap attachments to transfer seamlessly
Worth a Spot on Your Bench?
Yes.
The Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x earns its premium positioning in our experience. We used it repeatedly on curly, past-shoulder-length hair and came away most impressed by how quickly it dried while maintaining volume. Having also used the Shark FlexStyle, we’d choose the Dyson when performance is the priority.
Its price remains the obvious barrier, and the FlexStyle makes a compelling case for shoppers focused on value. But for a frequent styler prepared to spend at this level, we think the Co-anda2x justifies the premium.
BeautyBench Score: 9.4/10
How We Tested & Researched
BeautyBench personally used the Dyson Airwrap Co-anda2x several times on curly, past-shoulder-length hair. Our firsthand evaluation focused on drying speed, styling performance, volume retention and overall multi-styler experience. We have also personally used the Shark FlexStyle.
Product specifications and feature information were cross-checked against current Dyson documentation. We also reviewed independent professional testing to provide context beyond our own hair type and experience. Outside testing did not replace our firsthand assessment.
Sources consulted: Dyson product documentation and user guidance; independent testing and reporting from Allure and TechRadar.
Affiliate disclosure: BeautyBench may earn a commission if you purchase through qualifying links on this page, at no additional cost to you. Affiliate relationships do not determine our scores, conclusions or editorial coverage.